Randomized Clinical Trials Show That Veinlite® Is Better Than AccuVein® AV300 and VeinViewer® for Venous Access

Randomized Clinical Trials are the gold standard for assessing how a device compares to standard of care (current method of vein access). Several clinical trials have now been done to assess whether vein finder devices help improve vein access in children and adults. These devices include the Veinlite^®, AccuVein^® AV300, VeinViewer^® and VeinLuminator™.

The results show that the Veinlite^® clearly improves vein access in children, while near infrared devices, such as AccuVein^® AV300 and VeinViewer^®, are NO better than standard of care.

The following is a list of randomized clinical trials with a short summary of the results and the name of the device used. A full abstract of the publication can be obtained from the National Library of Medicine by clicking on the link below or from the web site www.pubmed.gov.

Summary of randomized clinical trials with Veinlite®, AccuVein® AV300 and VeinViewer®

STUDY #	DEVICE	# of PATIENTS	RESULTS
10	Veinlite®	240	YES, IMPROVED
2	AccuVein® AV300	1913	NO DIFFERENCE
5	AccuVein® AV300	266	NO DIFFERENCE
6	AccuVein® AV300	146	NO DIFFERENCE
2	VeinViewer®	1913	NO DIFFERENCE
4	VeinViewer®	299	NO DIFFERENCE
7	VeinViewer®	155	YES, NEONATES
8	VeinViewer®	323	NO DIFFERENCE

TABLE 1 – Summary Table of randomized clinical trials done with Veinlite^®, AccuVein^® AV300 and VeinViewer^® to determine if these devices help during venous access in children and adults. Please review the attached literature summaries for additional information about the studies

Literature Search Results from the National Library of Medicine on Transilluminators and Near Infrared Devices for Vein Access

Meta Analysis of Transilluminators and Near Infrared Devices for Vein Access in Children

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.